13 Canadian MPs say The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement should not keep drug prices high

Canadians currently pay the second highest drug prices in the OECD. It is vital that Canada does everything possible to make drug prices affordable for people.

Unfortunately, provisions in the new Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) contribute to rising drug prices that will make publicly funded drug programs – including a national pharmacare program – more expensive. Chapter 20 of CUSMA would obligate Canada to maintain an array of policies that protect pharmaceutical companies from competition so they can charge high prices for medicines.

Specifically, the CUSMA would keep drug prices out of reach for patients by requiring Canada to provide 10 years of marketing exclusivity for brand name biologic medicines. Currently, this market exclusivity in Canada is eight years.

Biologic drugs include vital treatments for cancer, anti-inflammatory medicines and some vaccines. Already, biologic treatments can cost upwards of $20,000 to $30,000. In some cases, the cost can go as high as $100,000. A recent Parliamentary Budget Office report estimated that the first year of CUSMA could cost $169 million in higher drug costs. The report stated: “the CUSMA-induced increase in expenditures for consumers and drug plans would amount to at least $169 million in 2029, increasing annually thereafter.”

CUSMA would also require various patent “evergreening” policies to make it easier for brand-name drug companies to extend their monopolies through additional patents and patent extensions. And it would give pharmaceutical companies the ability to extend patents by challenging a five-year delay in the granting process.

These policies will have a direct impact on the affordability of our public drug systems.  Already, the PBO estimates that approximately 73 per cent of the increases to Quebec’s public drug plan spending between 2010 and 2016 came from biologics. A national pharmacare program will face similar financial pressures as more of these new drugs enter the market.

The election of a Democratic majority in the U.S. House of Representatives has created an opportunity to undo these terms. Congressional Democrats are insisting these terms be eliminated from CUSMA. Indeed, unless these terms that raise medicine prices are removed, U.S. Congress is unlikely to ratify the deal.

It is noted that the text of the last four enacted U.S. free trade agreements had to be altered after the agreements were signed in order to obtain congressional assent.

It is simply not in the interests of Canada and Québec that these provisions remain.  Already, when the U.S. left the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Canada and other governments removed provisions that would have locked in biologic market extensions. Mexico, as well, would be disadvantaged by these provisions as they currently have no marketing exclusivity for biologics.

CUSMA is an important trade agreement and it needs to be done correctly.

We, the undersigned Members of Parliament, express our support for the elimination of provisions that limit access to affordable medicines in the revised North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), also known as the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).

We call on the Canadian government to work with ­– or at least not be an obstacle to – members of U.S. Congress who want to remove the provisions in CUSMA that would keep drug prices out of reach for patients by requiring Canada to provide 10 years of marketing exclusivity for brand name biologic medicines.

Removing monopoly protections for pharmaceutical companies from CUSMA is in the interest of all people in Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Sheri Benson

Rachel Blaney

Alexandre Boulerice

François Choquette

Don Davies

Fin Donnelly

Cheryl Hardcastle

Jenny Kwan

Hélène Laverdière

Paul Manly

Elizabeth May

Irene Mathyssen

Tracey Ramsey

Sponsored by: